beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.03.31 2014고단1803

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 00:30 on October 3, 2014, the Defendant: (a) 10 minutes of 10 minutes of the desire to check the case, and to ask questions about E, who are the security guards belonging to the Donnam Police Station D branch of the Yanandong-dong Police Station D branch of the Yandong-dong Police Station, called “a son, son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s E

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the accused in the first protocol of trial;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The non-guilty part of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act

1. The Defendant: (a) around 00:05 on October 3, 2014, the facts charged: (b) around 00:05, the Defendant: (c) took a passenger taxi belonging to G Nana-si (53 years of age) operated by the Victim F (53) on the roads located in the Yandong, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; (d) went to the south-gu, Dongnam-gu; (c) took a dispute over his her her flab and flab on the back seat; and (d) went to the south-gu, Dong-gu; and (e) took a flab and flab on the back seat of the victim; and (e) took a flab and flab on the back seat of the passenger; and (e) took a flab of the victim’s flab and flab on the left by the victim; and (e) flabing the victim’s face with the victim’s f.

2. The victim F, who was assaulted by the victim F, stopped the taxi on the road. Therefore, it is difficult to view that the Defendant used the cab to assault the driver of the vehicle in operation, and the Defendant takes the Hand of the cab.