성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. In light of all the circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant is against the nature of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for six months and two years of suspended sentence), the punishment imposed by the court below (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor) is too unreasonable.
2. It is recognized that the defendant's judgment is against the victim, the victim's identity was confirmed, and the defendant has no record of crime as well as two times of fine due to the violation of the Road Traffic Act.
However, the crime of this case is deemed to have been taken six times against an unspecified woman in mobile camera with a specific part of the body of the defendant, and the defendant, who seems to have a normal satis, has shown a very poor crime to have been committed for his own sexual satisfaction, and the number and frequency of the crimes, majority of the victims, and if not arrested as a flagrant offender, it appears that the defendant committed any more crimes. In full view of all other circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, circumstances of the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime, etc., which are the conditions for the sentencing of this case, the court below's punishment is deemed to be proper and too unreasonable, and the above argument of the defendant is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.