beta
(영문) 청주지방법원 2020.05.15 2019고정816

특수협박

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives a large-scale passenger bus B 46 persons.

On August 3, 2019, the Defendant changed the course to the Defendant’s driving lane, which led to two-lanes while driving a nearby road on the right side of the Cheongju-dong 12-36, Seodong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Cheongju-si. The Defendant changed the course to the Defendant’s driving lane, making it rapid.

On the same day, at around 13:34, the Defendant discovered the passenger car of the victim who passed a two-lane road in the southnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-do, the other side of the 772-3 U.S. Seocheon-do, the other side of the road in the south-do, the other side of the road in the south-do, the other side of the road in the second parallel of the road in the second parallel of the victim, the other side of the road in the second parallel of the road in the direction of the victim, the other side of the bus in the operation of the brake, the other side of the bus in the second parallel of the victim, the other side of the bus in the second parallel of the vehicle in the second parallel of the defendant, and the other side of the bus in the second parallel of the road in the second parallel of the road in the second parallel of the road in the middle of the Cheongju-si, the other side of the road in the second parallel of the road in the middle.

Accordingly, the defendant carried a chartered bus, which is a dangerous object, and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel had a video recording (ROM), investigation report (Attachment of a video recording) and the victim's Gap-ray change, which led to the victim's rapid operation of the bus, and the victim's vehicle was put up to the same act as the stated in the facts charged. Thus, there was no intention to threaten the defendant, and even if the victim's intention was recognized, it did not violate the social rules.