2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The Defendant is a person who establishes and operates a H hospital located in G (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”).

B. I (hereinafter “the deceased”) was diagnosed at the Defendant Hospital on March 18, 2016, such as a chest pressure pressure and dunoba visa, etc., and was conducted on March 22, 2016, from around 13:10 to 15:40, 10, by inserting the cement into the charnel body inverted spine form (hereinafter “the instant surgery”).

C. At around 19:50 on March 22, 2016, the Deceased, after the operation, went away from the mind of the nurse and interview with the nurse, and the death of the colons and the heart was suspended.

Accordingly, the medical team in the defendant hospital conducted cardiopulmonary resuscitation and temporarily recovered from the deceased's heart boom, but at around 20:13 on the same day, the blood pressure and beebling of the deceased have been lost again.

Accordingly, the Deceased was transferred to J Hospital around 20:25 on the same day.

At around 20:34 on the same day, after the deceased arrived at the J Hospital emergency room, it was confirmed that the J Hospital’s medical team confirmed the occurrence of serious corrosion on the right bridge of the deceased, and that the deceased performed scambling surgery, as a result of the deceased’s implementation of scambling, it was found that not only a large quantity of pulmonary dyssis was generated, but also a large quantity of dysium was assembled

E. Accordingly, on March 23, 2016, J Hospital medical personnel diagnosed the deceased’s condition by means of acute pulmonary electric shock showor, etc., and conducted the diverse removal surgery, but the deceased’s consciousness was not recovered, and died of the diverse verification shock caused by acute pulmonary electric shock on March 29, 2016.

F. The plaintiff A is the deceased's spouse, and the plaintiff B, C, D, and E are the deceased's children.

【Ground of recognition】An absence of dispute, entry of Gap 1-4, 6, 8, 12

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was caused by the leakage of cement products into the blood pipe due to physical damage to the relative beer or beer, during the process of the instant operation at the Defendant Hospital.