However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) filed a dispute on the ground that the victim D(47 s) who made a high-speed-friendly victim's appearance at C cafeteria located in B, 17:30 on December 3, 2017, had the victim's right-hand part on the table; (b) had the victim's right-hand part on the table one time for the victim's right-hand part; and (c) had the victim's right-hand part on the table, which requires treatment for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for Reduction of Small Quantity (see, e.g., the degree of damage to the victim, the agreement with the victim, and the fact that the defendant reflects the mistake);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;