Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, it shall be 100.

1. No person who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities in the Republic of Korea shall employ any foreigner;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while operating Company B in E, a company located in E, from April 5, 2018 to May 24, 2018, employed 22 foreigners who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table, including having the foreign F, of nationality, who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities by possessing only visa exemption visa exemption visa exemption visa exemption visa (B-1) at the “E” factory located in E, a business establishment located in A, A, Si, Busan, and who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities.

2. Defendant B, a representative director of the Defendant, committed a violation as described in paragraph (1) with respect to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A notice of decision on examining each immigration offender;

1. Certificates of employment of foreigners, and written statements;

1. Contracts for production of pc absentee and for open management;

1. Each individual's entry into or departure from the Republic of Korea, detailed inquiries about each entry into or departure from the Republic of Korea, and the application of the statutes

1. Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the Immigration Control Act and Article 18 (3) of the same Act, and Article 94 subparagraph 2 of the same Act and Article 94 subparagraph 9 of the same Act, and Article 18 (3) of the same Act, and Article 99-3 subparagraph 2 of the Immigration Control Act, and Articles 94 subparagraph 9 and 18 (3) of the same Act;

1. Defendants who are subject to aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37 and Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who is detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The number of foreigners employed who are unable to engage in job-seeking activities on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not a small number, and the employment period is also short.

However, since it appears that the previous business operator employed foreigners and took over the business, the defendant A's statement and the above defendant committed the crime of this case.