정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, at the Internet website, operates a car page in the name of “C”, and the victim D was suspected of having used it personally on the ground that the victim D did not disclose the details of the support payments of ordinary members and the expenditure of the Defendant’s sexual light fund, etc.
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손) 피고인은 2010. 8. 31. 17:32경 서울 성동구 E아파트 101동 201호 피고인의 집에서 위 ‘C’ 카페에 접속하여 “D씨는 중간에서 착복한 돈을 지금이라도 변제해야 합니다”라는 제목으로 “D씨는 지금이라도 F형제가 G형제에게 주라며 성경 기금으로 건넨 돈 백만원을 횡령한 것에 대하여 형제들 앞에 사과하고 중간에 착복한 금 백만원을 변제해야 합니다. 어찌 하나님을 믿는 장로요 소위 사역자라는 사람이 F형제가 다른 형제에게 전해주라며 맡긴 돈을 중간에서 슬쩍 가로챌 수 있단 말입니까!”라는 글을 작성하여 게시하였다.
However, the fact was that the Defendant alleged as above on the basis of a vague suspicion without clear grounds that the Defendant embezzled the Fund.
The Defendant, as seen above, damaged the honor of the victim by the same method over 12 times from around 10:31 December 201, 201, as shown in the annexed list of crimes, as well as the honor of the victim.
B. At around 10:06 on July 6, 201, the Defendant received money from the Defendant on the Internet website NVber “C” bulletin board. The company of “the testee” has been found in why why is why, and why is, the face of Daehan has been taken. If common people, this behavior would not be expressed in figures, and publicly insultd the victim D by posting comments of the content of “I”.
2...