beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.10.17 2019나36119

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, except for the addition of the judgment of paragraph (2) to the allegations emphasized by the plaintiff in this court, and therefore, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Additional determination

A. The summary of the argument should have been reported immediately after the discovery of an unknown loss C, and the defendant should have conducted cardiopulmonary resuscitation after reporting it in 119.

However, according to the first-aid services log (Evidence A No. 7), the time when the Defendant’s employee reported to 119 was 11:53, and the first-aid services worker’s team team’s team team’s team “as a result of satisf or his employee’s death, 11:43) was found to be missing from the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right to the right

As a result, the defendant is responsible for the death of the deceased, since it was placed in the aggregate necessary for the birth of the deceased.

B. In order to accept the Plaintiff’s above assertion, 119 members shall be called up within the 119th immediately after the Defendant discovered the deceased and perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation, etc. against the deceased, and as a result, it shall be proved that the deceased could have been born.

However, even according to the plaintiff's argument on thalthy, where a cardiopulmonary resuscitation is conducted within the first four minutes, thalthy would lead to thalthy death without brain damage if a cardiopulmonary resuscitation is conducted within the first four minutes. However, when a cardiopulmonary resuscitation is conducted between four to six minutes, there is a high possibility of brain damage if thalthy death is conducted between six to ten minutes, and the possibility of thalthy damage is uncertain if thalthy death or thalthy death is conducted in excess of ten minutes.

Therefore, if an employee of the defendant discovered the deceased as the plaintiff's argument and reported it to 119, 119 members would have arrived at the accident site regardless of whether he had reported it.