배임수재등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.
1,986,846,800 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.
Punishment of the crime
[Status of the Defendant, etc.] around January 9, 2001, the Defendant entered E Co., Ltd. (12 floors of the F building in Sincheon-si, hereinafter “E”), and took charge of the business of selling Stop (large capacity storage devices) from July 1, 2007. From June 1, 2013 to April 1, 2015, the head of Stop business division was working as the head of the above business division from June 1, 2013 to December 24, 2015, and was in charge of business affairs, such as the storage of G Stop site and the selection of a trader.
H (Representative I, Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu J, J, 309; hereinafter referred to as “H”), K (Representative L, Seongdong-gu M, 203; hereinafter referred to as “K”), corporation N (representative O, Defendant’s East, and 203; hereinafter referred to as “P”), Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu J, 803; hereinafter referred to as “N”), Q Co., Ltd (the representative R, Yeongdeungpo-gu J, Seoul Yeongdeungpo-gu J, 212; hereinafter referred to as “N”), and Q (hereinafter referred to as “ Q”) are participating in the purchasing place or intermediate distribution enterprise directly purchasing G from G through the Defendant.
[Criminal facts]
1. On February 1, 2013, the Defendant was issued cash 35 million won from H office in receipt of an illegal solicitation from H representative I to “the selection of H as a trading company of H and various conveniences different.” From H office, from July 6, 2011 to October 15, 2015 [Attachment] as shown in the indictment from H representative and SI as stated in the first head of the sentence, but the Defendant was given cash in receipt of an illegal solicitation from H representative I as stated in the first head of the sentence, and according to this, the Defendant was given cash from H representative I, not a H corporation.
On the other hand, it is judged that there is no risk of substantial disadvantage to the defendant's exercise of his/her right of defense even if the facts charged are modified (hereinafter the same shall apply) and the indictment is admitted as stated in its reasoning.