If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 01:52 on July 20, 2012, the Defendant: (a) sent alcohol to the “EM store” operated by the victim D (the age of 36) who was in Western City C; and (b) opened all studs on the ground that in order to calculate the drinking value, the Defendant was required to search for the drinking while drinking together; and (c) the victim F (the age of 33) who is the head of the said main office of the said main office of drinking her her her her her her her her her her her her her her she she first her her her her she her, and (d) expressed the said victim’s her her bit her f

Therefore, when F contacts the victim D by telephone, and the victim D arrives at the D, the defendant was able to take a bath about D, and the defendant was scambling F's scam with his hand, and this D started to scam D's face with 91 pages of the investigation record of the victim who was pushed off with the defendant, and then scam with D and scam.

Furthermore, the Defendant: (a) took the face of the victim G (n, 19 years of age) who fights next to the Defendant at hand one time; (b) 26,91 of the investigation records; (c) 15 of the investigation records; and (d) 32,102 of the investigation records; (d) Dacined from the stairs to the victim H (n, 24 years of age); (c) Dacinal coordinates, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim F; and (d) 26,91 of the investigation records to the victim G; and (e) 15 of the investigation records; and (e) Hacked from the stairs to the victim H; and (e) 32,102 of the investigation records; (e) Dacinal coordinates, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim G; and (e) caused the victim H to suffer injury during two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each prosecutor's statement concerning G and H;

1. Each police statement made to F, G, and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting an offense: Articles 257 (1), 262, 260 (1), and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;