The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that the facts charged in this case was guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

In contrast to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation in violation of logical and empirical rules, by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the Building Act and the Special Act on the Safety Control of Publicly Used Establishments, or by violating the principle of

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.