상해
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. As to the part of the judgment of the court below on the part of the defendant's injury to the victim C, which was found not guilty of the judgment of the court below, according to the statements made by the victim C and witness F, although the defendant was guilty of this part of the facts charged that the victim C had inflicted an injury on the victim C, which requires two-day medical treatment, by pushing the victim C with the victim C and cutting it into the stairs, and the victim C was guilty, the court below rejected the above statement and acquitted the defendant. The judgment of the court below is erroneous in the misapprehension of facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.
2. The summary of the charge of injury to the victim C, which was acquitted by the lower court, is as follows: “The Defendant, as a result of meeting the face from the victim C at the time and place indicated in the judgment of the lower court, 2 times the part on the chest part of the above victim’s chest in drinking, and boomed the above victim with the fast and winter stairs, thereby damaging the victim with approximately two weeks of medical treatment.”
In regard to this, the lower court, based on the various circumstances indicated in its holding, determined that there is no evidence to prove the facts charged by the victim C due to the Defendant’s unlawful exercise of tangible power, and that there is no evidence to prove the facts charged, and that there is no evidence to prove the facts charged. Accordingly, the lower court acquitted the Defendant of this part of the facts charged.
Examining the above judgment of the court below in light of the records of this case, the above judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and there is an error of law by misunderstanding the facts as pointed out by the prosecutor, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.
I am.