However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On March 25, 2016, the Defendant: (a) requested the victim to provide alcohol at “E cafeteria” operated by the victim D in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, U.S. on March 25, 2016; (b) however, the Defendant said the victim’s refusal to provide alcohol; and (c) said, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to “Chewing feasia........” and damaged the entrance door door with the left hand, thereby damaging the above glass room of KRW 50,00 in the market value.

2. The Defendant who interfered with the performance of official duties is obliged to compensate for the value of the benefits of why he she gets inside, and to receive questions about his personal information from G, the police box of the State Police Station in Ulsan that was called out after receiving a report at the same place as that stated in paragraph 1 at around 16:55 on the same day as that stated in paragraph 1, and at the same time as that stated in paragraph 1 at around 112;

Chewing flachising flachis h.” The faces of the above G was flachising at one time, and the chest was flachising by hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties on criminal investigation and maintenance of public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of destroying property) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62(1) of the same Act on the grounds that there are many criminal records of the defendant, but most of the criminal records of the defendant are treated by the defendant as a matter of existence

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection;