On July 2, 2012, 07:40 on July 2, 201, the location of Gangnam-gu Seoul.

A. On July 2, 2012, around 07:40 on July 2, 2012, the Defendant suffered bodily injury, such as the opening of the back of the front line on the back side of the CGV film theater located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, due to shock on the private taxi located in B (hereinafter “instant vehicle”). The Defendant suffered bodily injury, such as the opening of the back of the front line on the back of the front line.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). B.

The Plaintiff, who entered into a car mutual aid agreement with respect to the instant vehicle from July 2012 to February 2013, paid the Plaintiff KRW 11,436,230 in total as the Defendant’s medical expenses to C Hospital, Central University Medical Center, and D Jeong, in relation to the instant accident.

C. On March 8, 2013, the Defendant filed a claim with the Plaintiff for the payment of damages of KRW 14,925,677 (the damages amounting to KRW 12,937,747, the damages amounting to KRW 1,000,000, such as direct payment of damages amounting to KRW 987,930).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 10, 11, 13 (including provisional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that “an obstacle to the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the opening of the party,” constitutes the Defendant’

In addition, if the amount of damages equivalent to the lost income suffered by the plaintiff is deducted from or offseted by the amount equivalent to the medical expenses equivalent to the amount of the king portion paid by the plaintiff even though the plaintiff was not obligated to pay, the amount of damages incurred by the defendant due to the accident of this case shall not exceed 500,000 won, which is equivalent to the consolation money

B. The defendant's assertion is that the defendant's injury, such as "a failure to reply to the right direction of the opposite party," was caused by the accident of this case, and therefore the plaintiff is the plaintiff.