beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.11.10 2017구단51580

추가상병불승인처분취소

Text

1. On October 24, 2016, the Defendant filed a claim against the Plaintiff for the revocation of the non-approval disposition for additional medical care.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 7, 2014, the Plaintiff was involved in an accident where he/she had been working at the site of the main city (C and D) sewage culvert maintenance work performed by B corporation (hereinafter “instant accident”). The Plaintiff was approved by the Defendant that he/she was suffering from the injury of the sculped salt base, the sculatory base, the sculatory base, both sides of the sculatory base, the sculatory base, the two sides of the sculatory base, the sculatory base, and the sculatory base, and was receiving medical care until October 31, 2015.

B. On August 23, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional medical care due to the instant injury with the Defendant on the ground that there was no proximate causal link between the instant accident and the instant injury and the instant injury, on October 24, 2016, on the grounds that there was no further causal link between the instant accident and the instant injury.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, 2, 4 through 10, and the purport of whole pleadings

2. We examine whether the part of the instant lawsuit seeking the revocation of the non-approval of the non-approval of the additional medical care is legitimate ex officio.

A lawsuit for cancellation shall be instituted within 90 days after the disposition is known.

(1) According to Article 20(1)1 of the Administrative Litigation Act, the defendant sent to the plaintiff a written disposition of "the notification of the result of processing an application for additional injury or disease and an application for additional medical care" on October 24, 2016 regarding the plaintiff's application for additional injury or disease and additional medical care on August 23, 2016. On January 23, 2017, the plaintiff filed the lawsuit of this case seeking the revocation of additional injury or disease approval among the above dispositions with the court on January 23, 2017. Accordingly, the plaintiff was informed of the fact that the above additional injury or disease approval was issued on January 23, 2017, and simultaneously notified by the above disposition and a single written disposition.