beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.08.28 2013고단2712

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C New Airport bus.

On March 10, 2013, the Defendant driven the above bus around 13:40 on March 10, 2013, stopped at the bus stops of the wind apartment apartment which is located in the sub-committee of the Suwon-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Suwon-si, and came from the direction of the large-scale distance.

Since there was a bus stop, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely, such as checking whether there was a person who is engaged in driving of the bus with the front, rear, and left and right of the bus, and whether there is a person who approaches the bus to the bus.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not discover the victim D (year 44) who is far away from the road front of the bus in which he neglected his duty of care on the right side of the bus due to negligence, and received the victim's clothes with the front right side of the bus of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused a large amount of scarcity death by occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of police statement concerning E and F;

1. A written result of autopsy;

1. According to the black image of the vehicle under way, the victim was seated in a bus stop, and the victim was ordinarily driven from 13:41:41:54: (a) on the date of the accident, 13:41:54: (b) on the front of the bus at around 41:59: (c) the defendant closed the bus immediately after the victim started driving, (d) the front door of the bus was closed, (d) the front door of the bus was completely closed at 41:56:41:41:41:41; and (d) the defendant was aware of the left side of the bus until 58:42:42:42:00 after the defendant confirmed the left side of the bus stop. Thus, the defendant did not have been able to witness the bus even if the victim appeared to have done abnormal acts since before the opening of the bus stop, and the defendant had exercised due care.