The defendant is a taxi guest, and the victim B (64 years, remaining) is a private taxi driver.

On June 20, 2017, the Defendant, at around 06:20 on June 20, 2017, entered into a dispute with the victim and the taxi fare settlement method at the 114 entrance of the glar 114 entrance of the Daegu-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, with the compensation for the State bonds, provided the victim’s bath theory that “I will see the victim’s head, spath, spath, spath, and spath from spathy, spathy, spathy, and spathy.” The Defendant, with the left hand, flad the victim’s face that requires approximately two-day medical treatment, thereby damaging the spathnity of the skin spath and spath in the inside part of the inner part, where the victim’s face needs to be treated.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (referring to the attachment of a medical certificate for injury and the ratio of the name of the crime);

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 59(1) of the Suspension of Pronouncement of Sentence (i.e., that the defendant is the first offender, the defendant is against his mistake, the degree of damage suffered by the victim is not significant, and the defendant agrees with the victim simply with the victim, and the victim does not want the punishment