However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On July 6, 2018, the Defendant driven C rocketing car under the influence of alcohol by 0.159% in blood, from the terminal located in the Sung-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-si to the 24-ro 24-gil of the same Eup/Myeon from the Seongbuk-gu to the Sung-dong residential road.

2. The Defendant, on July 7, 2018, driven C rocketing car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.15% in front of the Dandong-dong-dong on July 7, 2018, around 00:10, the Defendant driven C rocketing car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.15% in front of the Dandong-dong-dong-dong.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A survey report on each actual condition;

1. All on-site photographs;

1. Notification of the results of regulating driving of alcohol;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the detailed statement report on the situation of the driver who is placed in each State and the investigation report on each such driver;

1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution has already been punished for the crime of drinking alcohol driving: Provided, That the fact that the accused is against his/her wrong recognition, the fact that there exists no record of criminal punishment heavier than the fine, and other various conditions of sentencing, including the defendant's age, sex, criminal conduct, health status, family relationship, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as the same as the order;