2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at around 00:30, the main point of “D” in the operation of the Victim C, located on the third floor of Busan Maritime Traffic Daegu B, on the ground that there was a dispute over the credit value with the victim, and caused the dispute, and caused the damage to the victim’s main store business by cutting off the table table on the table, and continuously destroying the alcohol disease, contact, glass residues, etc. on the table; and (b) continuously cutting off the string of the main store entrance, the string of the car, credit card terminal device, etc. on the part of the victim’s own glass, such as a string, the string, the string, the string, and the 30 minutes of the credit card terminal, thereby hindering the victim’s main store business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Act on the Statement of Evidence C

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and the proviso of Article 50 and Article 42 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act);

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;