2. The judgment of the court below is that the defendant is the first offender, and the defendant appears to have committed the crime of this case by drinking and contingently is favorable to the defendant, or that the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties like this case requires strict punishment in order to establish a state law and order and eradicate the light of public authority, and there is no scambling that the defendant committed the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties by destroying the patrol vehicle, thereby damaging the public goods, and there is no other scambling efforts by finding the damaged police officer and making efforts to pay the repair cost of the patrol vehicle, and other various circumstances, which are conditions for the punishment specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the motive and circumstances of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, the defendant's age, character and behavior, and environment, are considered.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.