If the Defendants did not pay the above fines, they shall be prohibited.

Defendant

A is the chairperson of the Preparatory Committee for Reconstruction Promotion of Apartment Buildings in office, and the defendant B is the driver of the ELL car (private bridge car) who is the vice-chairperson of the Preparatory Committee for Reconstruction Promotion of Apartment Buildings.

A. On December 20, 2017, around 08:38, Defendant A’s property damage: (a) opened a warning paper (A4 paper) attached to the victim D(55 years), the chairperson of the representative meeting of the occupants of the apartment apartment C, in front of the representative meeting of the occupants of the apartment C, on December 20, 2017; (b) opened the door, thereby damaging the market price.

B. Defendant B’s property damage (1) was removed from around 12:12 on the same day, and the market price was destroyed by a person who was the president of the representative meeting of the C apartment occupants, who was the president of the C apartment building occupants, by putting in his hand a copy of a warning banner (1m in width and 1m in length) attached on the entrance of the office.

(2) At the same place on the same day, at around 16:00, one banner (one meter wide, one meter vertical length) was removed from the office entrance by the victim, who is the president of the representative council of occupants of C Apartments, at the same place, and one square meter installed on the office entrance, thereby destroying the market price.

Summary of Evidence

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act, each of the orders for provisional payment;