The execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. 모욕 피고인은 2016. 10. 1. 19:10경 부산 동래구 B에 있는 C편의점 앞에서 노상 방뇨를 하다가, 112 신고를 받고 출동한 부산동래경찰서 D지구대 소속 경찰공무원인 피해자 E가 신분 확인을 요청하자, 편의점 업주 등 약 10명의 주민들이 있는 자리에서 피해자에게 "야이 씨발 새끼들아, 내가 오줌 싼거 봤나. 웃기는 소리하고 자빠졌네. 개씨발 새끼들, 내가 청룡일진인데. 씨발 좆만한 새끼들, 개좃 같은 소리들 하고 있네."라고 여러 차례에 걸쳐 큰 소리로 말하여 피해자를 모욕하였다.

2. The Defendant, while taking the above desire at the above time and place, committed assaulting the police officer to the effect that “I may be punished as a crime of insult if I wish” by the said police officer, who is notified of the intent that “I will be punished as a crime of insult.” In doing so, the Defendant obstructed the police officer’s performance of duties in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of the crime.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act; Article 311 of the Criminal Act; Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act; and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of obstruction of performance of official duties of the country with reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act requires strict punishment in order to protect legitimate performance of official duties of the country with reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the circumstances and motive leading to each of the above crimes are inferior, the degree of violence committed against police officers is not limited, there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine, there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine, and there is no record of criminal punishment for the same crime, and the defendant's age,