2. The judgment of the court below is a favorable circumstance to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the defendant's mistake and reflects his fault, repayment of damages to the victim C, etc. However, each crime of this case is deemed to have been restored to all the damage of each crime of this case, but the crime of this case is considerably poor since it acquired money against many unspecified victims at the Internet goods transaction site, and the crime of this case has been subject to criminal punishment several times prior to the crime of this case, and the defendant has a history of criminal punishment prior to the crime of this case. In addition, in light of the fact that each crime of this case was committed repeatedly in a short period without being aware of the suspension period of execution due to the same crime, the risk of repeating the crime of this case seems to be high, and in consideration of all the sentencing conditions of the defendant's crime of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, background, frequency, size,

3. Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.