2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On March 23, 2013, around 04:10 on March 23, 2013, the Defendant: (a) acted as if he would normally pay the drinking value to the victim C’s main points; (b) ordered the two-way disease to the victim; and (c) provided the female employees who contact with the victim.

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have the money to calculate the drinking value at the time and the credit card payment means such as credit card, and there was no intention or ability to settle the price even if the Defendant orders the foregoing alcohol as above.

Accordingly, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, received an alcoholic beverage equivalent to KRW 100,000,00, and acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to KRW 30,000,00 for female employees.

2. In the above date, time, and place, the Defendant publicly insulting the victim by stating that “The victim, who is the business owner of the above main point, demands the alcohol value to the victim at the place where the victim, who is the owner of the above main point, is an employee of the main point, “I do not have any way to do so, I do not have any way to do so, and the same year,” and even before the police officer called for the victim upon receiving the victim’s report and called for “the victim as the victim of this weather and the year which caused the occurrence of the report.”

At the Busan Southern Police Station E zone located in Busan Nam-gu, the Defendant made a public insult of the victim by speaking the victim as “spawn, no money, and nickly,” at the seat of the police officer F, etc. belonging to the District, and openly insulting the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Act on the Statement of Evidence C

1. Articles 347 (1) and 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (i.e., the degree of damage is not heavier than that of the damage and the defendant acknowledges his mistake);

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;