When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The owner or employee of a business establishment subject to prohibition of access by and employment of juveniles shall verify the age of persons who have access to the business establishment and shall prohibit juveniles from entering the business establishment.

Nevertheless, on September 14, 2013, from around 23:00 to around 1:04 the following day, the Defendant had access to the said establishment without verifying the age of “C”, which is a juvenile-related entertainment drinking house operated by the Defendant, which is a juvenile-related establishment that was run by the Defendant in Seongdong-gu, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Each statement of E and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (including business permission); and

1. Article 59 Subparag. 8 and Article 29(2) of the former Juvenile Protection Act (Amended by Act No. 14067, Mar. 2, 2016);

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014).

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;