On July 13, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. at the Busan District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive around that time. On January 8, 2013, the Daegu District Court sentenced one year of imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny, etc. at the Daegu District Court, which became final and conclusive on the same day, which became final and conclusive on the same day, the sentence of suspended execution became void, and on August 2, 2014, the execution of each of the above punishment was completed at

On April 6, 2015, between 20:0 and 22:00, the Defendant: (a) went through the air-conditioner room in Daegu North-gu, Daegu-gu, and went into the house through a opened window; and (b) cut off the house through a opened window; (c) 3 of the Abrogate, the victim’s possession; (d) strings; (e) strings; (e) 2 of the marriage Bans; (e) strings; (e) 1 of the weddings comprised of arms; (f) 1; and (f) 13 of the total market value of 7,700,000, and 60,000 won in cash.

In addition, the Defendant, from around that time to May 27, 2015, stolen or attempted money and valuables worth KRW 12,830,000 in total by the same method eight times habitually, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table, from around that time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Each statement of D, F, G, H, I, and J;

1. Confirmation of personal identity of the thief incident fingerprints, investigation report (related to the on-site verification of a place of crime), penbook, each field photograph, investigation report (report on the reported price of the damaged goods), and investigation report (report on the market price of the damaged goods);

1. Previous convictions indicated in the judgment: Criminal history records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (verification of the date on which the previous case is confirmed and the date on which the sentence is executed);

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the extent that dampness is recognized in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the repeated crimes of the same kind in the judgment;

1. Articles 332, 330, and 342 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes.