When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 26, 2013, the Defendant appeared to take an oath as a witness in the Changwon District Court, the Changwon District Court, the branch court of Changwon, the main body of which is located in Mayang-si, as well as the case of registration for cancellation of ownership between the Plaintiff C, Defendant D, and E in the above court.

The defendant presented the plaintiff's agent's guarantee of special protocol guarantee, and answer to the question "I do not affix the seal. I do not affix the seal." The defendant's agent answer to the question "I do not affix the seal to the second guarantee letter of evidence Gap No. 7," and further answer to the question "I do not recognize the fact that the witness affixed the witness at that time because I would be forged with the witness at that time," "I would not recognize the fact that I have affixed the witness at that time." On the other hand, the defendant's agent's answer to the question "I would not affix the seal to the question of "I would not affix the seal", "I would not affix the seal to the question of whether I would like to say that I would know that I would not affix the seal to the seal because we would have been how F was in the guarantee letter by telephone communications at that time."

However, the facts revealed that the seal imprint affixed on the above guarantee certificate is identical to the Defendant’s seal imprint registered as the guarantor for the Act on Special Measures for the Transfer of Real Estate Ownership, etc. as G Village farmland member at the time of 1994, and that in telephone conversations with F, the fact that “the inside memory is unsatisfy, regardless of whether it is satisfy and well-known.”

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant;