When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant and the victim are de facto marital relations living together for about 10 years.

From May 21, 2014, the Defendant, along with the Victim B (Nam, 59 years of age), claimed that the Defendant had been living together with the Victim C building in Mapo City, and from August 2017, while living together with the Victim C building in Mapo City, and Hoho, and caused the Victim’s violent form, so the Defendant was living together with the Victim.

1. At around 11:00 on July 4, 2018, the Defendant, who entered a residence, replaced the locking device of the door door, which is the victim’s residence, through the key business operator, at a multi-household house located in the Gunpo-si building C, and entered the said facility and intrudes on the victim’s residence.

2. The Defendant, as described in the above paragraph (a), intrudes upon the victim’s residence at the same time and place as described in the above paragraph (a), and corrected the “amount equivalent to KRW 39,390,000 in the market price owned by the victim solely or jointly by the victim and the Defendant,” as the “amount equivalent to KRW 39,390,000 in the indictment,” in accordance with facts acknowledged by the evidence adopted by the victim and the Defendant.

A total of 81 items, such as TV, air conditioners, etc., were stolen through staff members of the truck.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. A complaint;

1. Investigation report (Investigation of Damage) [Defendant and his defense counsel] asserts that each act of this case constitutes an act of self-help under the Criminal Act to respond to a lessor’s request for return of the leased object and thus constitutes an act of self-help under the Criminal Act. The act of self-help under the Criminal Act refers to a reasonable act to avoid the impossibility or significant difficulty of the exercise of the right to claim in the event that it is impossible to preserve the right to claim by legal procedure, and there is no circumstance to deem that the delivery of the house at the time of this case was difficult to take place by legal procedure