A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

However, as to the Defendants, this is against the Defendants.

1. On August 11, 2017, Defendant A appeared and taken an oath in the Seoul Northern District Court No. 401, Seoul Northern District Court 401, which was located in Dobong-gu, Seoul, as a witness for the obstruction of performance of official duties and obstruction of business with respect to C, and stated to the effect that “A around 21:00 on April 28, 2017, Defendant (C) and his/her day-to-day day-day day-to-day day-day day-day day-to-day day-day day-day day (D’s day-to-day day-day day-day day-day day-day day-day day-day day-day day-day day-day day-day day-day day-day day-day day-day day-day day-day day-day day-day day-day day-day day

However, in fact, the above temporary border B laid the floor of the above, and C and E did an act to interfere with the operation of the restaurant by putting the c and E on the floor, by combining it with it, and neglecting the operation of the restaurant.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

2. On August 11, 2017, Defendant B appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the Seoul Northern District Court 401, Seoul Northern District Court 401, which was located in Dobong-gu, Seoul, Seoul, with respect to the obstruction of performance of official duties and obstruction of duties against C, and stated to the effect that “A was not in dispute with an employee in D’s restaurant at around April 28, 2017, and C did not have any sound to the employee, and C did not deem that C was at the time of police officer.”

However, in fact, at the same time, the defendant was on the floor as in Paragraph 1, and C and E committed an act that interferes with the operation of the restaurant by putting a scambling with the scambling, etc., and at the time when C and E assaulted a police officer, the defendant made a false statement in favor of C, who was a witness of assaulting a police officer after C, even though C and C had testified with a police officer.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement 1.