구상금
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
The grounds alleged by the plaintiff in this court while filing an appeal are not significantly different from those already asserted in the first instance trial.
Therefore, the court's explanation on the instant case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is by the text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act
(1) The court below's decision is justified in holding that the court below's decision did not err by misapprehending the legal principles as to the subsidiary nature of guaranteed liabilities under the Civil Act on the ground that "the rehabilitation plan does not affect the rights of the debtor's guarantor or other joint debtor with the debtor for whom the rehabilitation procedure has commenced, and other joint debtor with the debtor for whom the rehabilitation procedure has commenced" under Article 250 (2) of the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act. The above judgment provides an exception to the subsidiary nature of guaranteed liabilities under the Civil Act. The court below's decision is justified in holding that "if a debt-equity swap takes place in the corporate improvement procedure through a set-off agreement between the creditor and the financial institution, the debtor, and the debtor's existing debt amount equal to that of the debtor's new debt amount, the debt of the creditor's debt shall be deemed to have been repaid in the manner of a set-off agreement extinguishing all the debtor's debt amount."