A. On February 20, 2012, the Plaintiff is a person who performs interior works, etc. with the trade name of “C”, and the Defendant concluded a lease contract with respect to the entire first floor among the buildings located in Seo-gu Daejeon (hereinafter “instant building”) on the same year.

4. A person who partitioned the place of lease on a deposit basis (the right of lease on a deposit basis) and operated E shopping mall. B. The Defendant, a construction business operator known to Pyeongtaek around January 2012, is the Plaintiff, a construction business operator, who was in his knowledge of Pyeongtaek, shall perform the interior partition work of the instant building (including the construction work of external physical signboards, telecommunications work by door, and corridor construction work, etc.; hereinafter “the interior partition work of this case”).

2) The Plaintiff requested the construction of the parking lot floor construction, etc. (including the installation of two warehouses in the parking lot, the installation of outside lighting, and the Defendant’s office construction, etc. under the stairs; hereinafter “instant additional construction”).

(C) The Plaintiff completed the construction by additionally requesting the construction. (C) At the request of the Defendant, the Plaintiff performed the interior of several locations of interior of the instant building (see, e.g., evidence No. 3). The place where the Plaintiff performed the interior works at the Defendant’s request is the place where the Plaintiff performed the interior works is located at the Defendant’s request, which is seven times the interior of the instant building (hereinafter “the instant interior works”). The interior of the Defendant’s store, the Defendant’s male and female store (including re-construction), the lessee’s F store, and the lessee’s G store (hereinafter “the instant interior works”).

(D) The Defendant paid a total of KRW 49,20,000 to the Plaintiff with respect to the instant internal subdivision, additional installation, and interior installation, and interior installation. [The grounds for recognition: the fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1-17, 20, 21 (including paper numbers), witness H’s testimony, and the purport of the entire pleadings.

2. Determination

A. The purport of the Plaintiff’s assertion is 106,90,000 won for internal subdivision of the instant case, 5 million won for the instant additional construction, and 32,90,000 won for the instant interior subdivision (4.7 million won for store x 7 million won), and the Defendant paid 49,200,000 won among them.