However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the operation of urban buses No. 68.

On October 13, 2014, the Defendant driven the above city bus around 12:53 on October 13, 2014, and proceeded with the fourth-lane road in front of Busan Nam-gu C along the same 4-lane away from the boundary of the front intersection.

At the time, there was a crosswalk in which signal lights are installed, so in such a case, the person engaged in driving service had a duty of care to safely drive the brupt in accordance with the good faith while accurately operating the brush and steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so, neglected the vehicle stop signal in front of the crosswalk and caused the victim E, who has dried the crosswalk according to the pedestrian signal, by negligence, to go beyond the front part of the bus.

The Defendant suffered from an injury, such as a duplic cage, including four or more cupages, which require approximately eight weeks of medical treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of E traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1), Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Criminal Facts, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the parties have agreed with the victim and that the mistake is recognized);