When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 10:00 on July 24, 2015, the Defendant: (a) cafeteria operated by the Victim C in Gwangju-si B, stating that “the victim was under the influence of alcohol; (b) the victim was able to do so; and (c) the victim was able to do so at the house,” making it difficult for the victim, among 2 customers in the restaurant, to have approximately one hour of 1 hour, such as “Ying-si, fark, fark, fark, fark, fark, and sound.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol law to C

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, selection of fines (including the fact that the accused has been led to a fine in the same kind and twice, the accused is led to confession and reflect, and the victim does not want punishment against the accused, etc.);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.