beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2015.07.16 2015고합23

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 15, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.) at the Gangnam Branch of the Chuncheon District Court on February 15, 2013, and completed the execution of the sentence on June 12, 2014.

1. A violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Intimidation, etc.) found that the Defendant was fluorous due to the victim C’s reporting that he/she had been living in prison, and that on April 16, 2015, at around 23:45, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol to “E located in Gangnam-si D” operated by the victim C of the victim C of Gangseo-si, Gangnam-si, the Defendant threatened with the death of the fluor, which caused the fluor, and caused the fluoring of the fluor, even though he/she does not know of how much he/she died, and that he/she will die, and that he/she will also die, and that he/she will do so.”

As a result, the defendant threatened the victim C with the purpose of retaliation against the provision of the investigation warrant in relation to his criminal case investigation or trial.

2. On April 16, 2015, at around 23:50, the Defendant threatened the victim F (year 47) of the victim F (year 47), who was the seat of C, due to the reason that the victim F (year 47) who was the seat of C, in front of the E main office located in Gangnam-si D, would escape from his/her body, and caused the victim’s physical harm.

3. On April 17, 2015, the Defendant obstruction of performance of official duties: 00:01, in front of the E main office located in Gangnam-si, and reported for the same reason under paragraph 1 in front of the E main office located in Gangnam-si, H of the Gangnam Police Station G District Unit in the Gangseo-gu Police Station G District, and the slope I asked the Defendant about the circumstances of the case, “I” to “I”, and I dominate’s law.