Seized evidence 2 shall be confiscated.

20,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

[Criminal Power] On January 4, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and six months at the Daegu District Court on April 21, 201, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Wood Prison on April 21, 2012.

【Criminal Facts】

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

1. At around 18:00 on January 7, 2013, the Defendant administered approximately 0.03g of the psychotropic drugs delivered from F in a single-use safeguard unit, in which the Defendant injected the left arms by inserting approximately 0.03g of the psychotropic drugs delivered from F in a single-use safeguard unit and dilution them into the left arms.

2. Around 17:00 on January 20, 2013, the Defendant administered approximately 0.03g of clophones, which remain after being administered as in the preceding paragraph, in the play room located in Daegu-gu G, by dilution them with water.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The protocol of prosecutorial statement concerning H;

1. Seizure records;

1. Report on each investigation (report on photographs of seized articles, notification of the result of duplicative appraisal: Training and calculation of additional collection charges);

1. Previous records: References to criminal records, investigation reports (verification of the date of release and attachment of judgment) and statutes shall apply;

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1), and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. under Relevant Acts concerning criminal facts (elective of imprisonment);

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The main sentence of Article 67 of the Act on the Management of Confiscated Narcotics;

1. The Defendant for the reason of sentencing under the proviso of Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime, and even during the period of repeated crime, again committed the instant crime, not only has committed the instant crime but also has to be punished more than eight times for the same criminal offense.

However, the defendant's confession and reflect that he does not repeat again while committing the crime, the defendant's nearest extradition is trying to avoid repeating the crime, and the defendant's age, family environment, etc.