회사에 관한 소송
1. On August 14, 2014, the Defendant stated each item on the agenda in the separate sheet as set out in G, which is located in G, in the Haju City of 11:00.
1. Basic facts
A. 1) The defendant is an incorporated association established for mutual cooperation, exchange, etc. among the members of the Dogwons. 2) The plaintiff A was a director with the defendant's power of representation (including registration for restriction on the power of representation that only the plaintiff has power of representation). The remaining plaintiffs are the former directors of the defendant. The plaintiffs are the following.
There are people dismissed from the position of the defendant's director by the resolution of the special general meeting.
B. On August 5, 2014, one of the Defendant’s directors of the temporary general meeting resolution of August 14, 2014, I, one of the Defendant’s directors, is the sender of the Defendant’s “Representative Acting and Acting President I” to the Defendant’s members, and received from the Defendant’s auditJ a petition for convening an extraordinary general meeting, such as the attached Form (However, the petition for convening the auditJ’s meeting was not attached to the notice for convening an extraordinary general meeting). On July 24, 2014, the case of petition re-appellanted by the resolution of the board of directors by the board of directors on July 24,
2. Cases of petition for corporate restructuring;
3. Giving a notice of convening an extraordinary general meeting as of August 14, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as “instant notice of convening an extraordinary general meeting”) to the effect that the “other urgent agenda” is a general meeting agenda item.
(2) On August 14, 2014, the Defendant passed a resolution to remove the Plaintiff from the board of directors, elect four new directors, and transfer the principal office) on the agenda indicated in the attached list as follows: (a) on August 14, 2014, the Defendant is the “resolution to the instant resolution to the special meeting.” (b) The Defendant is the “resolution to the instant resolution to the general meeting.”
A. Before 200:
C. The defendant's articles of incorporation No. 4, hereinafter referred to as "the articles of incorporation of this case with the defendant's permission from the Gangwon-do Office."
§ 13. (Types and Number of Officers) The contents of this case are as follows:
1. The categories and the fixed number of officers of this corporation shall be as follows:
1 representative director;
(b) Eight directors (including one representative director);
(c) two auditors. (Duties of auditors) Article 19 (Duties of Auditors)