2. In full view of the circumstances indicated by the lower court on the grounds of sentencing and the fact that there is no change in circumstances after the lower court’s judgment, the Defendant did not have any criminal record related to a sex offense, but the record of criminal punishment including interference with business affairs reaches 35 times, and all other sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments in this case, the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed appropriate and is too unreasonable, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.