합격자지위확인
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. A person who has been discharged from active service or whose appointment was revoked on a temporary basis by not later than the date of appointment of a person discharged from active service or a person scheduled to be discharged from active service (by March 31, 13) by not later than the date on which the appointment of a person discharged from active service is revoked on or before the date of appointment of a person scheduled to be discharged from active service: A person who has preferential treatment to those who have worked in the field of welfare in the military dormitory: A social welfare worker, psychological counselor, professional counselor, computer utilization ability, test schedule, such as a list of persons scheduled to be discharged from active service, and a person who has passed since March 31, 100: A notice of a successful candidate at the time of announcement
A. The National Armed Forces under the Defendant’s control publicly announced the employment plan of the employees, including the head of “C”, a Gun dormitory located in the area of Gwangju metropolitan area D Jeon-nam (hereinafter “C”), including the head of employment position of discharged soldiers, one (1).
Among them, the qualification requirements and test schedules set out in C History Employment Process (hereinafter referred to as “instant Employment Process”) are as follows:
B. The Plaintiff, who was discharged from active service on May 2010, supported the recruitment procedure of the instant case, and the Defendant, including the Plaintiff, conducted an interview against seven soldiers discharged from active service who applied for the same recruitment procedure.
As a result, F was selected as a final successful applicant and entered into an employment contract with the head of the National Armed Forces Welfare Center on March 29, 2013 when the period is three years.
C. At the time of the interview in the recruitment process of this case, the interview was conducted by the interview committee members consisting of five persons, including active service officers, by adding up the results of the interview by item to the examination of the applicants. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 17588, Feb. 1, 2007>
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of evidence Nos. 2 and 3, purport of the whole pleadings
2. The plaintiff's assertion
A. The Plaintiff’s “psychological counselor,” “vocational counselor,” “class 1 in tax affairs.”