If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is a person who has no fixed occupation.

1. On May 30, 2012, the Defendant corrected “12,100,00 won as stated in the Bill of Indictment of 12,100 won using computer game services from May 31, 2012 to May 31, 2012, since the fact in the Ecccception of the Defendant’s 3rd victim D’s 20:45, the Defendant did not have any money in water and was provided with the above C’s computer game services even if the Defendant had no intent to pay the said fee, and was assigned a job as if the Defendant would have paid the normal fee to the victim, and then, until May 31, 2012, the Defendant corrected the fee as above.

considerable financial benefits have been acquired.

2. On June 5, 2012, the Defendant acquired the pecuniary benefits of an amount of KRW 24,600 for the use of a computer game service and received money equivalent to KRW 5,000 for the use of the computer game service from June 10, 2012 to June 30, 2012, even if there was no money in water, and even if the Defendant was provided with the above c-based computer game service, the Defendant received the said c-based game service and the person, etc., even though he did not intend to pay the said fee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of D and I;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (general) (five pages, 33 pages of investigation records);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;