장해등급결정처분취소
On March 11, 2019, the Defendant revoked the determination of a disability grade against the Plaintiff.
Costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On August 9, 2016, the Plaintiff, who worked as an employee of the Dispute Resolution Co., Ltd., was involved in an accident that covers the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the “accident in this case”) with a cover containing stone materials stored in the said company’s raw material storage (weight of 600 km per unit).
On August 19, 2016, after the instant accident, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care with the Defendant as to “damage to the mouths D12-L1-2, the lower part of the body, and the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body.” The Defendant approved medical care as to “damage to the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part
On February 2, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an additional sickness application with the Defendant with respect to “malutronism, re-explosive disorder, and serious symptoms without any existing mental symptoms,” and completed medical care around November 23, 2018.
B. On November 29, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an application for disability benefits with the Defendant on the ground that the disability level attached at the time was indicated in the disability examination report as “maths due to dysical damage,” and the injury and disease name, which caused the disability, as “aftermath of dys from dysical damage, NOS of nesical disorder of nesalutical balutism, and an unknown e
C. On March 11, 2019, the Defendant determined the disability grade of the Plaintiff as class 6 (hereinafter the instant disposition) on the basis of the following individual disability assessment through the Integrated Review Committee (hereinafter “Joint Review Committee”).
People with disabilities in the middle-class 14 of general 7 who have remaining disabilities in the middle-class 7 of general 11 and who have remaining in the middle-class 14 of those who have remaining in the middle-class spinal root disorder (final calculation) at the same time are applied mutatis mutandis by the method of the adjustment of grade 6 applying mutatis mutandis [the state of disability] 16 to those who have remaining in the chest long-term disorder of 19.00% of the functional disorder of 19.0% [도요] 42.0% of the chronic root disorder of 11th 7th 14th 14th 7th 14th 7th 7th 14th 7th 7th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th