If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

On August 29, 2017, the Defendant would offer 200,000 won per month from a person who has no name to use a physical card.

“Around August 30, 2017, in light of the fact that the act of fraud by using another person’s account was character and conduct in front of the residence of the Daegu Seo-gu criminal suspect C, without securing the method of guaranteeing the right to return the check, “A” sent the check to the account (D) of the Defendant’s name via Kwikset’s Kwikset Service.

Accordingly, the Defendant transferred the electronic financial transaction access media to another person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to certificates of deposit transactions;

1. Articles 49(4)1, 6(3)1, and 6(3)1 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions concerning criminal facts (the fact that the defendant is against himself/herself at the time of committing the crime of this case, the first crime, and other circumstances shown in the argument of this case shall be considered);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;