한국마사회법위반등
1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.
However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
A is a person who has been sentenced to two years of imprisonment due to the opening of gambling in the Incheon District Court on January 9, 2003, and Defendant B is a person who has served as a lighting teacher in the mar race track from July 1, 2009 to the mar race track.
On February 2, 2012, the Defendants purchased the Gam-mar in the Austrian Republic of Korea, along with the Gam-mar G on behalf of the Defendants, with the purchase of the Gam-mar in the Gamian, he stored golf while he feling friendship, and asked the Defendant B of the horse information, the Defendants informed the Defendant B of the health status of the racing and horse-mar that he manages on commission.
1. Defendant A
(a) No one shall participate in racing in his/her name by registering his/her own horse in the name of marina, without registering the marina business in the name of marina;
Around May 29, 2014, the Defendant registered “H”, the horses owned by the Defendant, in the name of Mar. G around the Republic of Korea Mar. 14, 2015, in the Mar. 14, 2015, in the Mar. 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) registered “H”, the horses owned by the Defendant, in the Mar. 29, 2014, in the Mar. 14, 2015; and (b) registered the horses owned by the Defendant in the name of another person seven times in total, as shown in attached Table 1, from October 11, 2015.
2) It shall not give or promise to give, or express an intention to offer, property or property benefits to a lighting assistant or horse manager by making an illegal solicitation in connection with his/her duties.
On February 2, 2014, the Defendant purchased the “H” of Mari-Ma, along with Mari-Ma, and registered in the name of Mari-Ma, as described in the foregoing paragraph (1).
An assistant teacher B was well aware of the fact that the actual owner who purchased “H” is not the Marin G but the defendant, and even though he did not entrust the management of the horses owned by a person who is not the M, he was entrusted with the horses of the defendant from February 2015.