beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2013.03.27 2012고정3228

모욕

Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 13:40 on February 27, 2012, the Defendant, along with D, found to the G, audit E, general F, Dong representative G, Dong representative H, managing director I, etc., and followed whether the Defendant spent his criminal case attorney appointment expenses from apartment landscaping management expenses to the victim of the apartment apartment council, the Defendant, while asking for whether the letters in the above attorney appointment contract in question are the victim, was sexually insultingly insulting the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness J and I;

1. Statement to J police officers;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the I;

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his/her defense counsel's assertion on the claim of the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserts that the defendant is in the same position as the mother's representative of occupants who should work for residents, and that the victim only speaks that he/she is "a person who is bad" to the victim, and that there was no insult of the victim as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment.

In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence in the judgment, i.e., witness J and I made a statement that the victim had made the statement as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the defendant, and the victim J, the victim, made a statement that the victim was able to have a sense of aversion and sense of shame and shame expressed in the defendant's criminal facts, and made a statement that he was able to have an expression of the intent to destroy light, it can be recognized that the victim was insulting as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the defendant, and thus