1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court as to the Defendant’s grounds for appeal, the lower court is justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty of the remainder of the charges charged on February 13, 2015, with the reasons indicated in its reasoning, except for the portion of a contribution act by himself/herself on February 13, 2015. In so doing, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations as alleged

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the records, it is justifiable for the lower court to reverse the judgment of the first instance that found the Defendant guilty on February 13, 2015 of the facts charged in the instant case on the ground that there is no proof of crime regarding the act of contribution on February 13, 2015 among the facts charged. In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical

Meanwhile, although the prosecutor appealed to the entire judgment of the court below, he did not state the specific reasons in the petition of appeal as to the guilty portion, and does not state the reasons for appeal in the letter of appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.