beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.06.24 2020고단1660

공무집행방해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for three months.

Reasons

On June 16, 2016, the Defendant had been sentenced to four years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual Special Assault) at the Jung-gu District Court on the charge of the crime and completed the execution of the sentence on January 26, 2020.

Punishment of the crime

On April 3, 2020, the Defendant: (a) committed assaulting D’s shock frame at the Macheon Police Station C District on April 22, 2020, on the ground that an employee of the said district group was her mother, and (b) took the Defendant’s desire to “Ie franium” against police officers working in the said district group on the ground that he was her mother was her telephone; (c) committed assaulting D’s shock frame at one time by her hand, who was working in front of the Defendant in order to prevent danger.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the job of the situation in the district.

Summary of Evidence

1. Previous records in the judgment of the defendant in relation to the defendant's legal statement Eul of the witness D's statement in his/her court statement, the police officer's statement processing table, the investigation report on police officer's certificate copies (Attachment to the CCTV images and scam images), the bar camp, and the global CCTV video CDs: The criminal history record inquiry report (A), and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes on criminal investigation reports (verification of criminal records);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act among repeated offenders;

1. Scope of punishment by law: One month to ten years;

2. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of type] the obstruction of performance of official duties [Type 1]/ the obstruction of performance of official duties [the scope of recommendations and recommendations] no person shall be subject to the coercion of official duties [the scope of recommendations and recommendations]. The basic area of recommendation, six months to one year and six months.

3. The Defendant, as stated in the judgment of the court, completed the execution of the sentence as stated in the record of the crime, and again committed the instant crime at the time when three months have not passed since then.

It seems that the police officers are tightly tightly knicked to the police officers who suffered a disturbance by entering the district belt, who is the defendant, and take a bath.