However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On November 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) recommended the victim, etc. to return home to the Defendant on the ground that, at around 20:10 on November 23, 2017, the victim C’s “D” restaurant operated by Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu Seoul, for the reason that the currently isolated wife does not drinking himself/herself while working at the above restaurant; (b) he/she found in the above restaurant while drinking alcohol and food and drinking alone under the influence of alcohol; and (c) recommended the victim, etc. to return home to the Defendant; and (d) the victim, etc., including the background and F of the Seoul Yangcheon Police Station E District, Scman, and G, sent out after receiving a report by 112, who was under the influence of alcohol.

“In other words, customers were able to feel uneasiness by entering the said restaurant again, putting sound into the restaurant, putting it out, and putting it out at an resistance, putting the partitions in the said restaurant, and breaking the office equipment, such as bottles, instant cups, and entertainment, which were on the table, and putting customers in the said restaurant.

As a result, the suspect interfered with the operation of the above restaurant for about 20 minutes by force.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, and at the same time and place, and at the same time and place, the Defendant: (a) the male guest, who spawd, after receiving a report of 112 stating that he would drink alcohol from the A.M.; (b) the background F of the E District belonging to the Yangcheon Police Station E District of Seoul, Yangcheon Police Station, and Gman, who was called out, proposed him to return home; (c) the Defendant continued to spawn the spath while refusing it; and (d) the above F, “I will throw off the spath from the opening, spaths, and clothes of the spath; and (c) the witness tried to arrest him as a current offender of the obstruction of the performance of official duties; and (d) the said G’s spathd with the kn

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials with respect to the handling of reports and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to C, F, and G;

1. Application of video CD-recording statutes;

1. Criminal facts;