However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 12:50 on May 8, 2018, the Defendant, at the “E” restaurant operated by the Victim D (76 tax) in Gwangju Northern-gu, about 12:50 on May 8, 2018, both food and drinked during food orders, and “Is food and drink.”

“In the end, I throw away the table from the door to the door, throwing the chair on the floor, and let the guests leave the door at that place.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of the statutes governing photographs at the time of crime;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for the observation of protection and observation - The fact that the defendant acknowledges his/her mistake, the fact that the defendant has agreed with the victim - An unfavorable circumstance: The fact that the defendant has a history of punishment for the same crime, such as being punished by a fine due to a obstruction of business in 2013 and in 2016, due to a obstruction of business in 2013;