However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[2017 Highest 1067] The Defendant is a person who operated the c'C', ‘D', ‘E', ‘F', ‘G', etc. in the Internet portal site, and sold bags and shoes.

The Defendant: (a) around April 22, 2016, at the Defendant’s residence located in Gumi-si H and 102; (b) reported the sales comments posted on the above “C” block, and (c) used the Kakakao Stockholm to sell 2 Dao Kao Stockholm to KRW 540,000.

However, even if the defendant receives the payment from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to send the bank.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 540,000 won from the injured party to the SC Japanese bank account (Account Number:J) in the name of the Defendant on the same day, from the injured party, from the time to December 24, 2016, from the time of the above method, the Defendant received a total of 16,440,000 won from the victims as shown in attached Table 1.

The written indictment states that “65 persons” was remitted to “16,610,000 won” from the injured party, but the crime Nos. 65 per annum of the annexed crime table of the above indictment is a duplicate entry of the crime No. 64 per annum (see, e.g., evidence records 74-83, 176 pages). Thus, without changing the indictment, it is corrected to delete No. 65 per annum from the daily list of the above crime without changing the indictment, and the number of victims and the amount of fraud shall be corrected as above.

Accordingly, the defendant was informed of the victims to receive property.

[2017 고단 1660] 피고인은 2016. 7. 13. 경 구미시 H, 102호에 있는 피고인의 집에서, 피고인이 운영하는 블 로그에 게시된 판매 글을 보고 연락한 피해자 K에게 “ 대금 870,000원을 송금해 주면 버킨 프리미엄 백, 샤넬 슬리퍼( 모 조품 )를 배송해 주겠다.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, even if the defendant receives the payment from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to send the above goods.

The defendant.