However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 22, 2016, the Defendant set the drinking value from "D main points" located in Gui-si C around 01:10 to E, an employee, as an issue of payment of the drinking value.

Defendant: (a) the police officer G, who was called upon receiving the report of 112 that there was the above violence incident, she prevented the police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties in relation to the investigation and prevention of crime, by stating that “I am flick, knick, and knick, I am out”; (b) when G’s chest part is flick at one time as a drinking house; (c) when G’s chest part is flick, G is flick, and it interferes with the police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties in relation to criminal investigation and prevention.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. E statements;

1. Application of statutes, such as statements;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts of crime (elective of imprisonment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (the following favorable circumstances):

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection, etc. of Social Service Order [Scope of Recommendation] No person who does not exist in the basic area (from June to January 4) (special sentencing person] (determination of sentence] (determination of sentence] in order to establish national legal order and eradicate the light of public authority, it is necessary to strictly punish a crime against public authority, such as interference with the performance of official duties.

The Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, assaults a police officer who performs duties such as preventing a crime, is on the charge of the crime.

Even if there is a history of punishment for the same crime, the crime of this case has been committed.

However, the defendant's mistake is recognized and depthed.

In 2006, only two fines have been imposed after the person has been punished for the suspension of execution for the same crime.

At present, it seems that the health is not good.

In this context, the scope of recommendations on the sentencing guidelines, and other various sentencing conditions, such as Defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and result, and circumstances after the crime.