However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who operates an Internet computer game room in the name of “C” on the second floor of a building located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

No one shall provide game products for the distribution or use, the contents of which are different from those classified by the Game Products Management Committee, or display or store them for such purposes.

Nevertheless, from February 2019 to January 21, 2020, the Defendant installed ten computers with the above “C” from around February 2019 to January 21, 202, and then allowed many unspecified customers visiting the above room to use the said game products by providing them with a new game machine in advance so that they can charge them directly differently from the content of the rating, and providing them with a ID and password, and filling them through a manager page.

As a result, the defendant provided game products with contents different from the contents of the classification.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Reporting on detection (Violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act);

1. Application of statutes governing enforcement manuals;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, subparagraph 4 of Article 45 and Article 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Selection of Game Industry Promotion, and Selection of Imprisonment with labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Scope of recommendation [decision of types] according to the sentencing guidelines, provision for the use, etc. of illegal game products [Type 1] and basic area of provision for the use of game products which are different from the classification [the scope of recommendation and recommendation], and six months to one year and two months;

2. The crime of this case by which the defendant provided the game software that was not classified by using the PC 10 unit and operated the game room.

The defendant is different from May 16, 2019.